|
| |
Reverse Auctions
A recommendation by the NAPM for participation in
"Reverse
Auctions"
Organisations responsible for managing auctions may not be
familiar with the complexity of paper merchanting and, as a result, there may
often be a wide gap between the products and services required by the ultimate
customer and the products and services bid for by the merchant.
It is easy for the smaller details; drop sizes, special
packaging, credit terms, multiple drop destinations etc., to remain
unspecified and therefore not be costed in by, or expected to be required
from, the merchant.
The aim of a "Best Practice" procedure is to
ensure that this knowledge gap is bridged and that all those involved in the
process are better assured of a satisfactory outcome.
It is believed that, if merchants adopt a "best
practice" approach to reverse auctions, the valued services that we
offer will be given the prominence they deserve during the auction process.
It needs to be realised that a very high percentage of
reverse auctions result in the incumbent supplier being re-awarded the
business, but often at a lower price.
It is not yet apparent whether reverse auctions are here
to stay or whether they will, after delivering some initial benefits, fall
from favour in the paper sector.
Suggested "Best Practice"
1. Prior To The Auction Process
a. Merchants should seek, prior to the auction process,
to obtain from the customer, directly and not just via any appointed agent,
a complete understanding of the requirements of the business. This will
include: -
- Volumes
- Drop sizes
- Special wrapping requirements
- Payment arrangements
- Understanding the present qualities and pricing
structures needed; having been provided with samples for benchmarking
- Meeting the key personnel and forging a
relationship
- Being given the opportunity to present the
capabilities of the merchant and their differentiation in the market.
In summary, fully understand what is being asked for.
b. Having ascertained the customer’s needs, decide how
to manage the business and prepare a bid that both reflects the competitive
offer required but also recognises all details of the customer’s
purchasing criteria.
c. Work together with the customer, or the customer’s
agent, to ensure the auction process provides a format that accommodates all
the various aspects of the proposal covered in (a) above.
d. Be prepared for the auction process. Discuss with the
customer, or the customer’s agent, prior to the auction exactly how the
procedure is to be followed and be sure that all personnel are fully
prepared.
e. Do not have any advance discussions or agreements with
any other bidders or merchants about the terms of your or their bids as
doing so will amount to a serious breach of competition law.
2.
During The Auction Process
a. Ensure that the pre-auction discussions and details of
the proposal are clearly and accurately recorded and bid accordingly.
b. Avoid falling into the "Las Vegas" trap and losing sight of the proposal details and all the intricacies required by
the customer.
c. Watch out for changes in the pre-auction proposal
e.g.:
- Increase/decrease of drop sizes
- Improvement/deterioration of qualities requested.
Be prepared to amend the proposal in such event.
3. Post Auction
Often the lowest bid made at the auction is not accepted and
merchants are then invited to attend a post auction meeting at which the
benefits of the deal, services and qualities, can, once more, be stressed.
Again, you should not discuss your bid or the levels to which you would be
willing to lower it with any other bidders or merchants.
At this stage check again that the "bid and the
offer" match!
It is not the intention of this "Best Practice" to
limit any merchant’s competitiveness; rather, by recommending a "Best
Practice", to ensure that the needs of the customer are best addressed and
that the discussions between the customer and the chosen merchant after the bid
has been accepted do not reveal a wide gap between customer demand and merchant
offering. |